<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Regulator Consultations Responses Archives - GDF</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gdf.io/resource/regulator-consultations-responses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gdf.io/resource/regulator-consultations-responses/</link>
	<description>Global Digital Finance &#124; Advancing Digital Finance &#124; GDF.io</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 14:07:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>GDF Response to DFSA CP170 on Operational Resilience</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-dfsa-cp170-on-operational-resilience/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gdf.io/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Dubai Financial Services Authority’s (DFSA) Consultation Paper No. 170 on Operational Resilience. The response broadly supports the DFSA’s proposed framework and welcomes its proportionate and principles-based approach to operational resilience for Authorised Persons operating within the DIFC. GDF supports the requirement for firms to identify critical [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-dfsa-cp170-on-operational-resilience/">GDF Response to DFSA CP170 on Operational Resilience</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Dubai Financial Services Authority’s (DFSA) Consultation Paper No. 170 on Operational Resilience. The response broadly supports the DFSA’s proposed framework and welcomes its proportionate and principles-based approach to operational resilience for Authorised Persons operating within the DIFC.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>GDF supports the requirement for firms to identify critical business services, set impact tolerances, and embed operational resilience governance at board level in line with international standards. The submission also welcomes the flexibility provided around scenario testing, mapping of critical resources, and resilience planning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>From the perspective of digital asset firms, GDF encourages the DFSA to recognise the unique operational dependencies associated with blockchain infrastructure, smart contracts, custody arrangements, and shared technology providers. The response also recommends additional clarity regarding proportionality for smaller firms, recognition of group governance arrangements, and practical guidance on reassessment triggers and reporting expectations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Overall, GDF supports the DFSA’s objective of strengthening operational resilience while maintaining a flexible, technology-neutral, and internationally aligned regulatory framework for the DIFC.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Submitted:<br>20/05/2026</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-dfsa-cp170-on-operational-resilience/">GDF Response to DFSA CP170 on Operational Resilience</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMLA Consultation Paper on draft RTS on Customer Due Diligence</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/amla-consultation-paper-on-draft-rts-on-customer-due-diligence/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 14:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gdf.io/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to AMLA’s consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards under Article 28(1) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 relating to Customer Due Diligence (CDD). GDF supports AMLA’s objective of harmonising CDD requirements across Member States and sectors and welcomes the draft RTS’s emphasis on proportionality, simplification, and technology neutrality. The response [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/amla-consultation-paper-on-draft-rts-on-customer-due-diligence/">AMLA Consultation Paper on draft RTS on Customer Due Diligence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to AMLA’s consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards under Article 28(1) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 relating to Customer Due Diligence (CDD).<br><br>GDF supports AMLA’s objective of harmonising CDD requirements across Member States and sectors and welcomes the draft RTS’s emphasis on proportionality, simplification, and technology neutrality. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The response highlights the importance of ensuring that AML/CFT obligations remain workable across a broad range of digital asset business models, including cryptoasset service providers (CASPs), stablecoin issuers, and infrastructure firms.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>The submission recommends targeted clarifications regarding the use of privacy-preserving verification technologies, treatment of self-hosted wallets, application of blockchain analytics, and the interpretation of customer risk factors and ownership structures. GDF also encourages AMLA to ensure that technical data collection requirements remain proportionate and aligned with GDPR principles.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Additionally, the response supports the recognition of on-chain transparency and blockchain analytics as effective risk mitigation tools capable of supporting simplified due diligence measures in lower-risk digital asset contexts. Overall, GDF welcomes AMLA’s balanced and risk-based approach and encourages continued engagement with industry to ensure an effective and innovation-friendly AML/CFT framework.<br></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Submitted:<br>17/04/2026</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/amla-consultation-paper-on-draft-rts-on-customer-due-diligence/">AMLA Consultation Paper on draft RTS on Customer Due Diligence</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF Response to AMLA CP on draft RTS on criteria for identifying business relationships, occasional and linked transactions and lower thresholds</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-amla-cp-on-draft-rts-on-criteria-for-identifying-business-relationships-occasional-and-linked-transactions-and-lower-thresholds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 13:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gdf.io/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Anti-Money Laundering Authority’s (AMLA) consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards under Article 19(9) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 relating to business relationships, occasional transactions, linked transactions, and lower thresholds. GDF broadly supports AMLA’s principles-based and proportionate approach aimed at reducing fragmentation across Member States and sectors. The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-amla-cp-on-draft-rts-on-criteria-for-identifying-business-relationships-occasional-and-linked-transactions-and-lower-thresholds/">GDF Response to AMLA CP on draft RTS on criteria for identifying business relationships, occasional and linked transactions and lower thresholds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Anti-Money Laundering Authority’s (AMLA) consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards under Article 19(9) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 relating to business relationships, occasional transactions, linked transactions, and lower thresholds.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>GDF broadly supports AMLA’s principles-based and proportionate approach aimed at reducing fragmentation across Member States and sectors. The response welcomes the inclusion of online registration as a criterion relevant to establishing a business relationship and supports AMLA’s decision not to introduce additional lower thresholds for occasional transactions at this stage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>The submission provides targeted recommendations to improve clarity and operational consistency for cryptoasset service providers (CASPs), including clarification of the interaction between onboarding processes and ongoing business relationships, proportional application of linked transaction criteria, and recognition of blockchain analytics as a valid evidential tool. GDF also encourages AMLA to ensure that technical indicators such as IP addresses and geolocation data are not treated as standalone indicators of linked transactions and that implementation remains consistent with data protection obligations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Overall, GDF supports the adoption of a workable and proportionate framework that promotes supervisory consistency while recognising the operational characteristics of digital asset business models.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Submitted:<br>17/04/2026</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-amla-cp-on-draft-rts-on-criteria-for-identifying-business-relationships-occasional-and-linked-transactions-and-lower-thresholds/">GDF Response to AMLA CP on draft RTS on criteria for identifying business relationships, occasional and linked transactions and lower thresholds</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF &#038; CCI Response to UK HMRC Call for Evidence on Stablecoin Taxation</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-uk-hmrc-call-for-evidence-on-stablecoin-taxation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 13:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gdf.io/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) and the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) submitted a joint response to HMRC’s Call for Evidence on the taxation of stablecoins. The response supports the UK government’s recognition that stablecoins represent a distinct category of digital assets primarily designed for payments, settlement, and financial market infrastructure use cases. GDF and CCI [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-uk-hmrc-call-for-evidence-on-stablecoin-taxation/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to UK HMRC Call for Evidence on Stablecoin Taxation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) and the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) submitted a joint response to HMRC’s Call for Evidence on the taxation of stablecoins. The response supports the UK government’s recognition that stablecoins represent a distinct category of digital assets primarily designed for payments, settlement, and financial market infrastructure use cases.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>GDF and CCI argue that qualifying stablecoins should be treated as money-like for tax purposes, rather than as speculative cryptoassets. The response highlights that the current Capital Gains Tax (CGT) treatment creates disproportionate administrative burdens for individuals using stablecoins for routine payments and remittances, discouraging adoption and undermining the UK’s broader digital asset and payments innovation objectives.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>The submission recommends a full CGT exemption for qualifying stablecoins and advocates for a more coherent Corporation Tax framework that treats qualifying stablecoins consistently with fiat currency and money debts. It also calls for greater clarity regarding the tax treatment of stablecoin lending and stresses the importance of ensuring that tax reforms align with the UK’s wider regulatory framework for digital assets and payments innovation.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><br>Overall, GDF and CCI encourage HMRC to adopt a proportionate, future-proof, and internationally coherent tax framework that supports stablecoin adoption and reinforces the UK’s ambition to become a global digital finance hub.<br><br>Submitted:<br>(TBC)</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-uk-hmrc-call-for-evidence-on-stablecoin-taxation/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to UK HMRC Call for Evidence on Stablecoin Taxation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF Response to OCC Request for Comments on Proposal to Implement GENIUS Act</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-occ-request-for-comments-on-proposal-to-implement-genius-act/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 13:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gdf.io/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) proposed rule implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. The response supports the OCC’s objective of establishing a clear and workable federal framework for payment stablecoin issuance while encouraging greater legal certainty, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-occ-request-for-comments-on-proposal-to-implement-genius-act/">GDF Response to OCC Request for Comments on Proposal to Implement GENIUS Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) proposed rule implementing the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act. The response supports the OCC’s objective of establishing a clear and workable federal framework for payment stablecoin issuance while encouraging greater legal certainty, proportionality, and technology neutrality across the regime.<br><br>GDF’s submission focuses on ensuring that the framework appropriately accommodates the operational realities of digital asset and stablecoin markets, including non-US issuer structures, token-based governance arrangements, and the role of intermediaries within the broader stablecoin ecosystem. The response recommends targeted clarifications relating to definitions of “control,” “customer,” “acting in concert,” and “payment stablecoin,” as well as guidance on reserve custody, tokenized deposits, distributed ledger technologies, and the treatment of public blockchain data.<br><br>The submission also encourages the OCC to adopt a functional and risk-based approach that supports innovation and international competitiveness while maintaining robust prudential, AML, and consumer protection standards. Overall, GDF welcomes the opportunity to contribute to the implementation of the GENIUS Act and supports the development of a clear and globally interoperable framework for stablecoin regulation in the United States.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Submitted:<br>01/05/2026</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-occ-request-for-comments-on-proposal-to-implement-genius-act/">GDF Response to OCC Request for Comments on Proposal to Implement GENIUS Act</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF Response to AMLA Consultation Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Business Relationships, Occasional Transactions and Linked Transactions</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-amla-consultation-paper-on-draft-regulatory-technical-standards-on-business-relationships-occasional-transactions-and-linked-transactions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 05:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gdfiodev.wpengine.com/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Anti-Money Laundering Authority’s (AMLA) consultation paper on the draft Regulatory Technical Standards specifying criteria for identifying business relationships, occasional transactions, and linked transactions under Article 19(9) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624. The response broadly supports AMLA’s objective of reducing fragmentation across Member States and sectors and establishing [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-amla-consultation-paper-on-draft-regulatory-technical-standards-on-business-relationships-occasional-transactions-and-linked-transactions/">GDF Response to AMLA Consultation Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Business Relationships, Occasional Transactions and Linked Transactions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Anti-Money Laundering Authority’s (AMLA) consultation paper on the draft Regulatory Technical Standards specifying criteria for identifying business relationships, occasional transactions, and linked transactions under Article 19(9) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624. The response broadly supports AMLA’s objective of reducing fragmentation across Member States and sectors and establishing a balanced, principles-based framework for anti-money laundering and counter-terorist financing obligations across the EU.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">GDF welcomes the inclusion of online registration as a criterion for identifying business relationships, noting that this is well suited to crypto-asset service provider (CASP) business models where onboarding and customer due diligence are typically completed through digital registration processes. GDF also supports AMLA’s decision not to introduce additional lower thresholds for occasional transactions at this stage and welcomes the proportionate treatment of sector-specific requirements for CASPs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The response recommends targeted clarifications to improve operational certainty and proportionality, particularly regarding when a business relationship should be considered established for CASPs, the application of linked transaction criteria, and the recognition of blockchain analytics as valid evidence for identifying common transaction characteristics. GDF also highlights the need to ensure that technical indicators such as IP addresses, device identifiers, geolocation, and common intermediaries are not treated as standalone indicators of linked transactions and should only be assessed alongside additional corroborating factors. The submission further addresses the proportionality of the rolling one-month linked transaction window, interaction with the Transfer of Funds Regulation, and the importance of aligning implementation with data protection requirements and broader compliance obligations across the sector.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Submitted:<br>17/04/2026</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-amla-consultation-paper-on-draft-regulatory-technical-standards-on-business-relationships-occasional-transactions-and-linked-transactions/">GDF Response to AMLA Consultation Paper on Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on Business Relationships, Occasional Transactions and Linked Transactions</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF &#038; CCI Response to FCA CP26/8: Quarterly Consultation Paper No. 51</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-fca-cp26-8-quarterly-consultation-paper-no-51/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 14:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gdfiodev.wpengine.com/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9464</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) and the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) submitted a joint response to the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) CP26/8 Quarterly Consultation Paper No. 51. The response broadly supports the FCA’s proposals to extend the Client Assets Sourcebook (CASS) framework to qualifying cryptoasset activities, viewing the approach as an important step toward [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-fca-cp26-8-quarterly-consultation-paper-no-51/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to FCA CP26/8: Quarterly Consultation Paper No. 51</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) and the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI) submitted a joint response to the UK Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) CP26/8 Quarterly Consultation Paper No. 51. The response broadly supports the FCA’s proposals to extend the Client Assets Sourcebook (CASS) framework to qualifying cryptoasset activities, viewing the approach as an important step toward a coherent, proportionate, and innovation-friendly regulatory regime for digital assets in the UK.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">GDF and CCI welcome the application of established client asset protections to cryptoasset activities and support the FCA’s objective of ensuring consistent safeguarding standards across traditional and digital financial services. The response recommends targeted clarifications to strengthen the framework, particularly regarding stablecoin backing assets, the application of CASS 8 mandate rules, and the treatment of technology providers involved in custody arrangements, including multi-party computation (MPC) solutions.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The submission also provides recommendations on reconciliation requirements, cross-border custody arrangements, operational resilience, and the interaction between different CASS chapters. Overall, GDF and CCI encourage a technology-neutral, proportionate regulatory approach that supports innovation while maintaining robust client asset protections and advancing the UK’s ambition to become a global digital finance hub.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Submitted:</strong><br>13/04/2026</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-fca-cp26-8-quarterly-consultation-paper-no-51/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to FCA CP26/8: Quarterly Consultation Paper No. 51</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF Response to ADGM FSRA Discussion Paper No. 1 of 2026: Proposed Guidance on Crypto Mining Activities</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-adgm-fsra-discussion-paper-no-1-of-2026-proposed-guidance-on-crypto-mining-activities/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 07:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gdfiodev.wpengine.com/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) Financial Services Regulatory Authority’s Discussion Paper No. 1 of 2026 on proposed guidance for crypto mining activities. The response broadly supports ADGM’s objective of establishing a risk-based, proportionate and transparent supervisory framework for commercial crypto mining activities conducted within or from [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-adgm-fsra-discussion-paper-no-1-of-2026-proposed-guidance-on-crypto-mining-activities/">GDF Response to ADGM FSRA Discussion Paper No. 1 of 2026: Proposed Guidance on Crypto Mining Activities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF) submitted a response to the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) Financial Services Regulatory Authority’s Discussion Paper No. 1 of 2026 on proposed guidance for crypto mining activities. The response broadly supports ADGM’s objective of establishing a risk-based, proportionate and transparent supervisory framework for commercial crypto mining activities conducted within or from ADGM.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">GDF’s submission welcomes the focus on governance, operational integrity and corporate transparency, while recommending further clarification on the scope of activities captured by the regime. In particular, it highlights the need to distinguish between proof-of-work mining, proof-of-stake validator operations, incidental node activity and supporting infrastructure services, to ensure the framework remains proportionate, clear and operationally workable. The response also provides recommendations on security controls, pre-licensing assessments, confidentiality of wallet disclosures, incident reporting, supervisory tools and the treatment of overseas operations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Submitted:<br><strong>20/03/2026</strong></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-response-to-adgm-fsra-discussion-paper-no-1-of-2026-proposed-guidance-on-crypto-mining-activities/">GDF Response to ADGM FSRA Discussion Paper No. 1 of 2026: Proposed Guidance on Crypto Mining Activities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF &#038; CCI Response to FCA CP26/4: Application of the FCA Handbook for Regulated Cryptoasset Activities &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-fca-cp26-4-application-of-the-fca-handbook-for-regulated-cryptoasset-activities-part-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 11:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gdfiodev.wpengine.com/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF), in partnership with the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI), submitted a joint response to the FCA’s consultation paper CP26/4 on the application of the FCA Handbook to regulated cryptoasset activities (Part 2). The response reflects input from a broad cross-section of the digital asset ecosystem, including exchanges, stablecoin issuers, financial market [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-fca-cp26-4-application-of-the-fca-handbook-for-regulated-cryptoasset-activities-part-2/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to FCA CP26/4: Application of the FCA Handbook for Regulated Cryptoasset Activities &#8211; Part 2</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF), in partnership with the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI), submitted a joint response to the FCA’s consultation paper CP26/4 on the application of the FCA Handbook to regulated cryptoasset activities (Part 2). The response reflects input from a broad cross-section of the digital asset ecosystem, including exchanges, stablecoin issuers, financial market infrastructure providers, and technology innovators.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The submission supports the development of a comprehensive and proportionate UK regulatory framework for cryptoassets that promotes responsible innovation while maintaining strong consumer protection and market integrity. It highlights key areas where further clarity and calibration may be beneficial to ensure the regime remains internationally competitive and capable of supporting the UK’s ambition to become a global hub for digital finance.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Submitted: 12/03/2026</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-fca-cp26-4-application-of-the-fca-handbook-for-regulated-cryptoasset-activities-part-2/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to FCA CP26/4: Application of the FCA Handbook for Regulated Cryptoasset Activities &#8211; Part 2</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>GDF &#038; CCI Response to the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee Inquiry on Stablecoins</title>
		<link>https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-the-house-of-lords-financial-services-regulation-committee-inquiry-on-stablecoins/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wptech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://gdfiodev.wpengine.com/?post_type=resources&#038;p=9330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Global Digital Finance (GDF), in partnership with the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI), submitted written evidence to the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee following oral testimony provided on 25 February. The response reflects the views of our joint membership, including major global stablecoin issuers and financial market participants. The submission highlights the potential [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-the-house-of-lords-financial-services-regulation-committee-inquiry-on-stablecoins/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee Inquiry on Stablecoins</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Global Digital Finance (GDF), in partnership with the Crypto Council for Innovation (CCI), submitted written evidence to the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee following oral testimony provided on 25 February. The response reflects the views of our joint membership, including major global stablecoin issuers and financial market participants.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The submission highlights the potential role of stablecoins in strengthening the UK&#8217;s digital financial infrastructure and supporting more efficient cross-border payments. It also outlines key considerations for the design of a competitive and proportionate regulatory framework, including reserve calibration, regulatory coordination between the FCA and the Bank of England, and the importance of ensuring the commercial viability of sterling-denominated stablecoins.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The response emphasises the UK&#8217;s structural advantages, such as deep capital markets, experienced regulators, and the legislative foundations under FSMA 2023, and sets out recommendations aimed at enabling the UK to remain internationally competitive while supporting responsible innovation in digital assets.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Submitted:<br>11/03/ 2026</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.gdf.io/resources/gdf-cci-response-to-the-house-of-lords-financial-services-regulation-committee-inquiry-on-stablecoins/">GDF &amp; CCI Response to the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee Inquiry on Stablecoins</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.gdf.io">GDF</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
